Friday, September 14, 2012

Interesting Trends In 40K Gaming

by SandWyrm


If you've never played with Google Trends, you're really missing something. If you enter a search term, Google will show you a graph of that term's search popularity back to 2004. It gives you a sense of what the Google-using population of the world is thinking about over time. Well, I wondered, what are they thinking about our hobby?

Let's start simple and try "Gamer". That's a good term for, well, folks who take the playing of games seriously as a pastime.


That looks like a nice gentle rise over time. Must be a growth market, eh? Well...

How about D&D, the grandaddy game of them all?


Well, more folks call it D&D than Dungeons And Dragons, but the 2 trend lines follow pretty closely. D&D has obviously seen better days in terms of interest, but at least it has leveled out it's plunge.


Magic The Gathering took quite a plunge too, to end up much as D&D has. Since both are now owned by the same company, this isn't too surprising really. By comparison, 40K just putts along relatively smoothly.


Warhammer Fantasy hasn't been so lucky. Having lost over 75% of it's popularity since late '04. It looks like the trend evened out a bit and even managed to gain slightly during 7th edition. But it's since lost about two-fifths of it's popularity under 8th edition!


Not that it matters much compared to 40K's overwhelming popularity. Why does GW spend so many resources on such a relatively unpopular game as WFB?


I guess it's big enough to matter. After all, Warmachine and Flames of War are in the same popularity range as WFB. In fact, both have surpassed it.

Colossals seem to have been good for Privateer lately. While Flames got an uptick after the new edition was released, fell some through the year, and is now rebounding. It's interesting, and confirms my own subjective impression of things.


Malifaux is getting there too. Go Wyrd!


FASA may be dead, but Battletech is still a strong brand. It's even starting to surpass Fantasy again in interest after a big plunge.


But back to 40K... It seems that GW's popularity has fallen by half since 2004. At this rate, they'll be near-zero in another 5-6 years. Not that they probably care, so long as we keep buying.


To be fair though, both Hasbro and Wizards have similar popularity problems. Though Hasbro gets some nice fat humps in during the holidays every year. Notice how those are getting progressively smaller? Interesting.


'Space Marines' is too general a search term to get meaningful codex results, but here's the graphs for the next four 5th Edition books. Notice the nice humps of popularity around each release. Well, except for Tyranids. If this translated at all to sales (and it probably did), it's no wonder that GW dragged it's feet in releasing later waves. From their standpoint, Nids were a huge sales disappointment. So they started ignoring them instead of helping them.


Leaving the Blood Angels in the list for reference, here's the rest of the 5th Edition books. No real popularity spike for the Sisters, but the White Dwarf PDF did revive them a bit.


I've always heard that Space Marines, Guard, and Orks are the top 3 sellers. Here's the chart to prove it. Where are the Eldar & Tau, who would desperately like some updated books? Well, they're down there in the corner looking very unpopular.


Should the new Dark Vengeance box set have contained Eldar instead of Dark Angels? The popularity numbers say so. A local store owner has told me that he's worried about the long-term sales of the set, because the Dark Angels are too specific a design to be able to use the models for other chapters. There may be something to that, or not. We'll see.


And finally, I thought that I would try and find some measure of the size of the hard-core competitive community compared to the bulk of 40K's adherents. We're that little red line at the bottom.

But, also look at the News reference volume. That activity from 2008 onwards is the rise of the blog community. Maybe that little red line has an effect on the popularity of the hobby as a whole, for both good and bad, out of all proportion to our numbers.

I certainly think so. Would 40K's numbers be higher or lower without us? GW probably thinks they would be higher. Which is why 6th Edition is designed the way it is. Specifically, I think, to discourage what they see as a noisy, impossible-to-please minority of their customers.

I like to think that we're propping them up. :)

EDIT: Just because all these wargames appear to be declining over time, that doesn't mean that everything is. Here's a real growth chart for ya...


MMO's are declining a bit after a big surge of interest, but oh man! Look at World of Tanks!


Apple and Microsoft have crossed in a very short period of time.


 Though Google rules all! :)

14 comments:

  1. Nifty work pulling that together. I've wondered in the past whether GW or the investors holding its strings use social media or web trending like this as a gauge: it would certainly explain some of their behavior, but is often the opposite. The one time I tried exploring this topic blogger didnt update the post to other blogrolls like normal so it was my all time lowest post for views. Ah sweet irony.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks. Try looking up Apple & Microsoft BTW, if you want to see one trend's rise cross another as it falls. It makes a nice X. :)

      Delete
  2. thanks for that, very cool stuff

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'm not sure that Fantasy is really that unpopular vs 40k. Maybe the Fantasy grognards are less internet-savvy, or maybe it's just the lack of online content for WFB?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Being a less internet-savvy group of gamers would push the whole Fantasy line up a bit in terms of searches. I'll even grant that, being a more expensive game overall than 40K, the line might go 2 times higher if you were to try and estimate sales. While Battletech and Malifaux would drop by 3-4x because they're inherently cheaper games to get into and maintain.

      But if the Fantasy line goes up to 2x it's search popularity in actual sales, that's pretty darn close to the roughly 78/21 40K/WHFB split that has been hinted at in the financials portion of the GW/Chapterhouse lawsuit.

      http://www.belloflostsouls.net/2012/09/legalwatch-games-workshop-vs-chs.html

      Delete
  4. Considering the near-unanimous downward slope of all of these games, I would wonder how much it represents people simply not having to do random searches anymore.
    From our sidebar, I can scroll through a dozen 40k blogs without touching Google, and the web grows from there.
    On the same (ish) token, GW has always enjoyed free word-of-mouth (and sight-of-eyes) marketing. I can tell my friends directly about the game, or where to get more info. People who happen onto a game night can look at all the pretty models, and get pointed in the right direction without having to do much of any legwork.

    This style of marketing, such as it is, could help explain why nearly every single system has seemed to halve in popularity over the last 8 years, while extremely generalist terms (like gamer) have gone up. Of course, spikes near codex drops (particularly the month before release when a PDF can usually be found) are expected.

    Interesting lines, though... I wonder if there's a way to find out how earlier searches compared to more recent ones in terms of what people were actually looking for.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Or, the entire market for tabletop wargames is shrinking as GenX+ gets older and GenY- choses other (cheaper) forms of entertainment. Just as Model Railroading has been in terminal decline since the 70's and 80's. THAT track is depressing, as even the holiday bumps have all but disappeared.

      If you want to see a very large growth curve, try typing in 'MMO' or 'World of Tanks'. That's what's stealing our interest. :)

      Delete
    2. Some growth examples have been added to the post.

      I don't think that Google Trends is detailed enough to do that. Type in more than 2 words and it often complains that it doesn't have enough data to go on.

      Delete
    3. I tried doing more granular sentiment analysis of social media streams rather than search trending for that exact reason. http://midlifegamingcrisis.blogspot.com/2012/03/complaining-about-gw-is-this-thing-even.html

      Delete
  5. Really interesting post, Sandy!

    Fer sure video games have taken a huge bite outta conventional tabletop wargames.
    It doesn't take a lotta effort to turn on an XBox, sign into Live and start gaming with friends. Real-time communication and immersive game worlds are just a click away, after all.
    I'm cool with our hobby being 'niche.' I hope to be tossing dice for as long as I live. I just hope I won't be stuck playing some dead game, from a dead company.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well, I was a hard core video gamer until I had kids and wanted to get out of the house once in a while. :)

      Delete
  6. Fun stuff. You want some interesting comparison points, put in "Halo" or any Grand Theft Auto game. Then put something like "Kardashian" or something to see what people really want, lol.

    ReplyDelete

Recent Favorites

All-Time Favorites