They are under SEGA now, but I don't know if that's a good or a bad thing either.
Still, anything would be better than "Shadow of the Horned Rat" was back in the 90's.
Thursday, April 23, 2015
Warhammer: TOTAL WAR!!!
by SandWyrm
This looks like it could be awesome, but I'm still fuming from how bad the last 2 TW games that I bought sucked. So I'm not sure what to think about another game from the same group.
They are under SEGA now, but I don't know if that's a good or a bad thing either.
Still, anything would be better than "Shadow of the Horned Rat" was back in the 90's.
They are under SEGA now, but I don't know if that's a good or a bad thing either.
Still, anything would be better than "Shadow of the Horned Rat" was back in the 90's.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Recent Favorites
-
by SandWyrm Someone has been kind enough to share their early copy of the 6th Edition rulebook with me, so I immediately looked up the ... -
by SandWyrm Just got an update on the Feb. 12th tourney from Nate, the TO. He's made some big changes, few of which I agree with. -
by SandWyrm Heh. There's quite the row on BoLS right now about what an acceptable army list printout looks like. Evidently Army Buil... -
by SandWyrm Quick question for the Back 40K community: What happens when you're forced to do an emergency disembark from a vehicle? -
by Uberdark The ninjas are there to distract you from the fact that I could'nt find a funny picture of Warhammer players. -
by Spaguatyrine So with some old competitive blood coming back to the game in the indianapolis area, there have been talks of ranking pla... -
by SandWyrm Uberdark took issue with something I said about Orks in the comments to my last IG article. So rather than derail that conver...
All-Time Favorites
-
by SandWyrm Love your blog and I love your articles about painting and color theory. It's a unique thing your blog has to offer so giv... -
by SandWyrm It's called 'Armored Warfare', and it concentrates on modern armor . Including MBTs, IFVs, etc. Looks as thoug... -
by Sandwyrm Battlefront's John Paul has promised to 'think about' listened to their fans and compromised on their BF-on... -
By Spaguatyrine So here is my shameless plug of me and Stelek at Nova. Man look at that sexy beast!!!! On the right of course!!! Want... -
By Spaguatyrine So for years now I have read and heard about how broken Space Marines are and how GW..
-
By TheGraveMind So I decided I'm going to take a week or two off of gaming, and work on my army looks. For starters I have two drop p... -
by SandWyrm Long-time back40K readers may remember the set-back Chimeras I converted last July for the 'Ard Boyz Semi-Finals. I ...
ReplyDeletethis looks cool. Until the world explodes, and you've got to wait for your reality bubble to bump into another reality bubble, then fight until they pull apart again.
I'll wait until I see some reviews. from non-GW Fanbois.
I doubt we'll see that nonsense in the game. First, because the Creative Assembly isn't that stupid, and second because they'll have been working on this for at least 1.5 - 2 years. Quite a bit before the "bubble" rumors started breaking.
ReplyDeleteDoes it have battleships? I'm having trouble caring about games without battleships right now.
ReplyDeleteLOL.
DeleteIt might, as the other Total War games have ships.
Huh, if only GW didn't just blow up their WFB world and kill off my armies... Might be something to look at eventually I guess...
ReplyDeleteI'm getting it. Don't care if it sucks.
ReplyDeleteOn one hand, Rome 2 was awful. On the other, Shogun 2 was one of the best games I ever played, and FoTS was an amazing expansion.
ReplyDeleteI'm cautiously optimistic that 2 weeks after release it'll be a good game.
Rome 1: Awesome. Still play it every year.
DeleteEmpire: Meh. WAY too big in scope. Gave up after 4-5 hours.
Rome 2: What. The. Frak? Gave up after 30 min.
If they don't have enough real history to over-detail and micromanage, this COULD be a decent game.