by Sandwyrm
Well well well... Looks like the 40K rulebook FAQ just got updated too.
We're now at version 1.2
There's not too many changes. What exactly a "turn" is gets clarified (finally). You must now declare which characters are joining which units before deployment (ouch!), and yes, if a unit which is falling back gets tank shocked, they will automatically fail their Morale check. There's a couple of other small changes in wording to previous items that clarifies their meaning.
What's more interesting than the changes themselves is the fact that we're getting a small maintenance update pretty close to the last one. It makes me think that GW is committing itself to more frequent FAQ updates. Which is a very good thing. Go GW!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Recent Favorites
-
by SandWyrm Someone has been kind enough to share their early copy of the 6th Edition rulebook with me, so I immediately looked up the ...
-
by SandWyrm 40K: "Hi, my name is 40K, and I have a problem." Players: "Hi 40K!" 40K: "I'm, I'm....
-
by SandWyrm Just got an update on the Feb. 12th tourney from Nate, the TO. He's made some big changes, few of which I agree with.
-
by SandWyrm Uberdark took issue with something I said about Orks in the comments to my last IG article. So rather than derail that conver...
-
by SandWyrm Heh. There's quite the row on BoLS right now about what an acceptable army list printout looks like. Evidently Army Buil...
-
by Spaguatyrine So with some old competitive blood coming back to the game in the indianapolis area, there have been talks of ranking pla...
-
by SandWyrm Quick question for the Back 40K community: What happens when you're forced to do an emergency disembark from a vehicle?
All-Time Favorites
-
by SandWyrm Love your blog and I love your articles about painting and color theory. It's a unique thing your blog has to offer so giv...
-
by SandWyrm It's called 'Armored Warfare', and it concentrates on modern armor . Including MBTs, IFVs, etc. Looks as thoug...
-
by Sandwyrm Battlefront's John Paul has promised to 'think about' listened to their fans and compromised on their BF-on...
-
By Spaguatyrine So here is my shameless plug of me and Stelek at Nova. Man look at that sexy beast!!!! On the right of course!!! Want...
-
By Spaguatyrine So for years now I have read and heard about how broken Space Marines are and how GW..
-
By TheGraveMind So I decided I'm going to take a week or two off of gaming, and work on my army looks. For starters I have two drop p...
-
by SandWyrm Long-time back40K readers may remember the set-back Chimeras I converted last July for the 'Ard Boyz Semi-Finals. I ...
The only real change is that characters have to be assigned before deployment, which isn't huge but will be annoying sometimes.
ReplyDeleteThe what a turn is, is already very clearly stated in the rule book. Page 9, top right, second sentence. "Whenever a rule uses the word 'turn', both in this rule book and in the codexes, it means 'players turn', otherwise it will clearly state 'game turn'.
I really don't know why people have so much trouble with this. It is really starting to annoy me. Atleast now it is officially stated twice.
Maybe GW have finally woken up to the fact that they run the simplest set of rules in the tabletop universe - and that the likes of Hordes, Warmachine, Infinity and even Flames of War have been kicking out rules adjustment (on far more complicated rules) with efficiency.
ReplyDeleteGW finally getting it's housekeeping in order - yeah!